Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

Alex Berenson

Logo of telegram channel alex_berenson — Alex Berenson A
Logo of telegram channel alex_berenson — Alex Berenson
Channel address: @alex_berenson
Categories: Politics , Health
Language: English
Subscribers: 20.21K
Description from channel

Former New York Times Journalist.
Former Wrongest Man of the Pandemic
Permanently Suspended from Twitter on 8/28/21. Reinstated 7/6/22
Chat Group here:
https://t.me/tellyourchildren
For all of the articles sign up here
https://alexberenson.substack.com

Ratings & Reviews

3.00

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

1

3 stars

0

2 stars

1

1 stars

0


The latest Messages

2022-10-12 22:01:27
Bourla did not define “at this stage.” But he could not have been referring to the moment of the interview. Pfizer was not making money on the vaccine at all in mid-2020. It was spending, as it moved the shot into a large clinical trial.

(Practically giving it away!)

SOURCE

Instead, Bourla appeared to mean the period in which Covid vaccine purchasing and distribution would be government-controlled and the shots offered globally to everyone for free — the “emergency” phase of the epidemic. Even J&J and AstraZeneca did not promise to sell their shots on a nonprofit basis forever.

In other words, Bourla appeared to say that for at least as long as the United States declared Covid an emergency, Pfizer would charge a “very nominal” price and make a “very marginal profit” on its vaccine.

About that.

(I DON’T MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS PFIZER, BUT I STILL GOTTA CHARGE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE) (2/?)
2.0K viewsedited  19:01
Open / Comment
2022-10-12 22:00:54 Behind every great fortune...
You know the mRNA Covid vaccines made lots of money for Pfizer, Moderna, and BioNTech. But did you have any idea how much?

In summer 2020, as Covid vaccines moved ahead at Warp Speed, the companies behind them promised they wouldn’t make too much money on them.

Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca both promised to sell their vaccines on a non-profit basis. J&J even committed to charging a single price worldwide, rather than charging countries like the United States more.

Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla was also emphatic. His company was developing a Covid vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money, he told Time magazine in July 2020.

“This is not business as usual,” he said. “If you were calculating return on investment, we would never do these things. We were discussing that back in March, what that means to human lives, to the economy of the world. So it was a must, that we must take those measures.”

A must! Thus Pfizer would not overcharge for the mRNA vaccine it was developing with the German company BioNTech, Bourla said.

“We are going to charge governments … a very, very nominal value,” he said [ellipsis in original interview]. Because Pfizer would charge so little, it believed governments should give its shot “free of charge to all citizens,” he said.

Asked directly if Pfizer intended to profit, Bourla said, “we will make a very, very marginal profit at this stage.” (1/?)
2.0K viewsedited  19:00
Open / Comment
2022-10-09 23:53:31
The Cal. Penal Code? I’m scared!

Hey, let’s see if we can find Andy Slavitt’s “personal” email address - that would be “andy.slavitt@gmail.com” - anywhere on the Internet.

Oh, here it is, at the bottom of an article he published in the JAMA Forum - that would be the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Andy Slavitt, MBA, United States of Care…” That doesn’t look too personal to me!

Okay, so he listed it once -

Whew! Guess I’m safe from San Quentin for the moment.

Slavitt has already made a yuuuge mistake in his responses to my outing him. I’m not going to tell you, or him, what it is yet. We’ll save that for the filing.

Until next time… (2/2)
5.8K views20:53
Open / Comment
2022-10-09 23:53:09
Andy Slavitt’s done got himself a lawyer

Who is sending scary letters to James Lawrence. Let's roll.

Hope he’s not too expensive because it could be a lot of hours. (Oh, he’s expensive.)

In my opinion this is a really stupid tack to take. We clearly have a viable claim, and I am clearly unafraid to sue. So sending windy and pointless threats is only likely to annoy me. But you get the legal advice you like, as a certain ex-president will be the first to tell you. (1/2)
5.2K viewsedited  20:53
Open / Comment
2022-10-09 23:23:30 The gap probably does not mean the DNA shots actually lower cardiac risk, but it is further evidence of the potential dangers of the mRNA jabs.

“The State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines,” Ladopo wrote in yesterday’s advisory. “Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution.”

Florida becomes the first state to break with continued federal efforts to push mRNA shots on everyone, including young adults at essentially no risk from Covid. But other countries have taken even more aggressive steps. On Sep. 30, Norway effectively discontinued further booster shots for almost everyone under 65.

To measure the risk, Florida compared the rate of cardiac and all-cause deaths that vaccinated people suffered up to 28 days following their second vaccination with those they suffered after the 28-day period, when the post-vaccine risk had presumably fallen. Like other “observational” studies, the method has flaws, but it can provide useful data.

The finding of higher risk in the days after vaccination is particularly striking because of a phenomenon that epidemiologists call as “healthy vaccine user bias.”

The bias works in two ways, both of which should favor vaccines in observational studies like the one from Florida.

First, people who are vaccinated tend to be healthier overall than those who are not; the most obvious example of this is that doctors generally withhold shots from people who are near death. Further, even after people have decided to be vaccinated, they generally will postpone doing so if they are feeling ill.

As a result, vaccinated people should have relatively low rates of illness and death in the weeks following their shots. The fact that they do not all by itself raises serious questions about the vaccines.

Now, for the first time, a major American public health authority has taken note. (2/2)
5.1K views20:23
Open / Comment
2022-10-09 23:23:18
Florida tells young men to avoid mRNA Covid shots

State data show that the risk of cardiac death doubles after vaccination for men under 40

Florida’s Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladopo, yesterday warned men aged 18-39 not to take Covid vaccines.

The warning is based on an analysis of data from inside Florida showing a sharply higher risk of cardiac death in young men in the 28 days following the shots. Men under 40 had a 84 percent increased risk of death following vaccination with an mRNA shot.

The analysis also found that people who received non-mRNA vaccinations - generally meaning the Johnson & Johnson DNA/AAV vaccine - had a lower risk of cardiac death after the shots. Only the mRNA jabs were associated with more cardiac deaths. (1/2)
5.1K viewsedited  20:23
Open / Comment
2022-10-09 04:26:03
The lil bird is misbehaving

Yes, Twitter has locked me out of my account. I have options you don’t to reverse this nonsense, and I’m going to use them, but it may take a little while. Doesn’t matter either way because Elon is going to be in charge soon.

The truth is that they’re having a tantrum because I am about to publish something that will be very embarrassing for them; they cannot stop me but they can (temporarily) keep me from using my account to do it.

If the last four months have taught me anything it’s how dysfunctional and badly-run a company Twitter really is; the sooner Elon gets in and puts grownups in charge the better.

Watch this space.
6.0K viewsedited  01:26
Open / Comment
2022-10-07 21:27:30
Now Australia has quietly all but given up on Covid vaccines for most adults. In a late August report, the Australian government-run group that advises the government on vaccinations said healthy adults under 50 do not need a second booster.

According to the group, “adults aged 30 to 49 years can [emphasis added] receive a second booster fourth dose of a COVID-19 vaccine; however the benefit for people in this age group is less certain.”

The rules for people under 30 are even tighter. For them, second boosters are reserved for anyone aged 16 to 30 who has “complex, chronic, or severe medical conditions.” No one under 16 is recommended to get a second booster.

Australia’s move is more proof of how quickly the debate around Covid vaccines in general and the mRNA shots in particular has shifted - even if Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet gotten the memo.

Oh well. At least he’s in the high-risk group. As the public service announcements used to say, the life you (don’t) save may be your own.(3/3)
6.3K viewsedited  18:27
Open / Comment
2022-10-07 21:26:51
But Australia’s change is arguably the most striking, because Australian states put extraordinary pressure on their people to submit to Covid vaccinations last fall and winter.

Mandates for work were only the beginning.

In November 2021, for example, Victoria - Australia’s second-largest state - decreed that only vaccinated people would be allowed in gyms, bars, restaurants, libraries, and “non-essential” retailers like bookstores and hairdressers. Two months later, the Northern Territory briefly placed unvaccinated people under a “snap lockdown,” confining them to their homes.

The pressure succeeded.

24 out of every 25 Australian adults received a primary two-dose Covid vaccination last year, mostly with mRNA shots from Pfizer and Moderna. Australians were also very accepting of boosters, with more than 7 out of 10 adults getting a third shot.

Yet 2022 has proven disastrous for Australia, both for Covid and public health generally. (2/3)
5.4K views18:26
Open / Comment
2022-10-07 21:26:28
The worldwide flight from mRNA shots continues
Australia has quietly stopped recommending more Covid vaccines for almost everyone under 50, and Norway under 65.

Only a few months ago, Australia had one of the world’s most aggressive coercion programs to force Covid vaccines on its people.

Now Australia has essentially ended its Covid vaccination program for healthy adults under 50 - and effectively banned the shots for people under 30, unless they have severe chronic illnesses.

With the change, Australia joins Denmark in curtailing its vaccine program for adults under 50.

Last week, Norway went even further, saying no one under 65 should receive additional shots unless they were at underlying risk of a severe disease course (oddly, Norway kept its recommendation for pregnant women.)

(The new Covid vaccine recommendations from Norway; obviously, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health HATES science)

SOURCE (1/3)
5.5K viewsedited  18:26
Open / Comment